Removing y avoids cache effects (if y is the size of the L1 cache, the
main array x is removed from it).
Moving init and timing out of the loop makes the scal benchmark behave like
the gemm benchmark, and allows higher accuracy for smaller test cases since
the loop overhead is much smaller than the timing overhead.

Example:
OPENBLAS_LOOPS=10000 ./dscal.goto 1024 8192 1024
on AMD Zen2 (7532) with 32k (4k doubles) L1 cache per core.

Before
From : 1024  To : 8192 Step = 1024 Inc_x = 1 Inc_y = 1 Loops = 10000
   SIZE       Flops
   1024 :     5627.08 MFlops   0.000000 sec
   2048 :     5907.34 MFlops   0.000000 sec
   3072 :     5553.30 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   4096 :     5446.38 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   5120 :     5504.61 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   6144 :     5501.80 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   7168 :     5547.43 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   8192 :     5548.46 MFlops   0.000001 sec

After
From : 1024  To : 8192 Step = 1024 Inc_x = 1 Inc_y = 1 Loops = 10000
   SIZE       Flops
   1024 :     6310.28 MFlops   0.000000 sec
   2048 :     6396.29 MFlops   0.000000 sec
   3072 :     6439.14 MFlops   0.000000 sec
   4096 :     6327.14 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   5120 :     5628.24 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   6144 :     5616.41 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   7168 :     5553.13 MFlops   0.000001 sec
   8192 :     5600.88 MFlops   0.000001 sec

We can see the L1->L2 switchover point is now where it should be, and the
number of flops for L1 is more accurate.